Saturday, August 26, 2017

I Have A Hat....But....

Yesterday I looked at all of the hatless players in the 1969 set.  Brett Allen left a comment with a link to a great explanation of one of the main reasons for so many hatless players.

In addition of the poor players without a hat, there were 71 players with a hat, but also with a Topps bad airbrush job.  The reason for so many of these is the same as with the hatless: Kansas City's move to Oakland, four expansion teams, a logo dispute with the Astros, and Marvin Miller.


4 comments:

  1. Look at Topps - trotting out a 5-year-old photo of Jim Grant when he was with the Indians.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since this is the 1969 set, you know I was going to dig deeper. Of the 71 cards you showed:
    31 are due to expansion
    27 from off-season trades (not necessarily the 68/69 off-season!)
    7 due to the Astros' logo issue
    5 due to the Athletics relocation after 1967
    1 (Tom Egan) due to the Angels relocation FOUR YEARS EARLIER!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sigh, 69 Topps still makes me sad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are you trying to single-handedly bring down the prices of '69 cards?

    ReplyDelete