Well, I've picked up the Cubs team set from O-Pee-Chee and the lazy bums at Upper Deck are at it again.
Check this out:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3ff4/c3ff4f9ade81781b071d80a3c399cfcd4db7d8ff" alt=""
Ryan Theriot, Upper Deck I & II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b60ee/b60eee78f5507428568fa081c079bd37674405dc" alt=""
Ryan Theriot, O-Pee-Chee. I guess they really like to see him slide.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d09/b2d09fa4e4ea2de8972281de2aa7f92aa874458a" alt=""
Rich Harden, Upper Deck I & II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bfa9/9bfa9a9165d2753bb7f34d7d3f75425f6d240840" alt=""
Rich Harden, O-Pee-Chee. Same away stadium, same wind up, just cropped a little tighter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eba53/eba53cc9f8cbabd41b5c3e01eaa1145ff9054228" alt=""
Ted Lilly, Upper Deck I & II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e012/5e012bfe9d7a348d9956b5203b9b86f3a213f7a8" alt=""
Ted Lilly, O-Pee-Chee. It's the same early spring game - brown ivy in all three cards.
And a couple of the card feature pictures from the same studio shoot as in Series II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/084a4/084a4909d4b75f5b5f5723bf1acb7eb0fbdbc785" alt=""
Milton Bradley, Series II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01416/0141622f0ec1de72036ea51f91ff8463ca5f5364" alt=""
Milton Bradley, O-Pee-Chee
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8f85/c8f8566dc868eb014b18832b2349f964a3d9d444" alt=""
Kevin Gregg, Series II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2002f/2002f5932a6eec2c54bb757a804700730677fa37" alt=""
Kevin Gregg, O-Pee-Chee
Hey, Upper Deck, if you're going to put out a different line, then use different shots!
Now that I have a good amount of exposure to both sets (just started collecting recently) this just goes to confirm my thoughts about Upper Deck. I do like the Goudey series, but O Pee Chee just falls flat, and the Flagship just seems over glossy and unoriginal. But seeing them side by side like this is just a horrible cop out for Upper Deck. Nice research.
ReplyDeleteI would agree. I too knew nothing of Upper Deck until I got got back into collecting about a year and a half ago, and UD does nothing for me.
ReplyDeleteUpper Deck has a number of issues that Topps doesn't. But I do like O-Pee-Chee. It's got an old-school feel and it's much better than the flagship set. I don't like this year's Goudey at all.
ReplyDeleteYour photos confirm something that I've thought for a while but never been able to do: commit to ONE set for each card company.
100% Was having this exact same discussion with my brother the ohter day. It's lazy and not good enough for the punters.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the breakdown--I see no need to collect both Cubs sets (or either, if you are a Topps enthusiast).
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly why I refuse to ever spend good money on Upper Deck products.
ReplyDeleteI know that prices are driven up by low supply and high demand, and I realize that baseball cards are really just photo editing jobs on cardboard, but why should I spend $10 for a pack of one product when I can get the SAME EXACT PICTURE out of a $1 pack of First Edition??? What do I care if a card is glossy or not? They all look the same in album sheets...